Microvellum Knowledge Network

Cut Part width and length different in label than in Nesting Optimization Report

We have an edgebander with premil, and we are trying to get setup with as much precision as possible so the cut size incorporates the banding thickness and the premill amount.  While doing that, I used decimal units to get as much precision as possible.  I notice the reported cut size on the label doesn't match the reported cut size on the Nesting Optimization report.  I tried to go into report designer and figure out why there is such a difference, but that's pretty advanced for me and I was unable to figure it out.  Does anybody know why these sizes are reported differently?


The difference is exactly 1/32" so it's not the premil amount, nor is it the edgebanding thickness amount.

    MVU eLearning



    Grow Your Knowledge
    Follow along with RJ as he takes you on a journey to build your foundational knowledge of Toolbox.


      Follow us on:

               

        Google Review